Welcome!

Average rate of Absenteeism in the workplace is 8 days – how do You manage workplace Absenteeism?

by Jennifer Cashman, Partner, Ronan Daly Jermyn Solicitors

Stress and back pain/injury are the most common causes of absenteeism according to a recent Small Firms Association (SFA) report. Employers in the community sector should be mindful that they are fulfilling their duty of care by including stress risk assessments as part of Health & Safety Statements reviews. 

Implementing a specific policy on workplace stress should also be considered. Aside from the absenteeism, stress can lead to a less productive workforce, faulty decision-making, and ultimately the possibility of legal action for negligence or constructive dismissal.

How do you manage Absenteeism in the workplace? 

Managing absenteeism in the workplace can be a difficult scenario for employers and the purpose of this article is to highlight the issues that employers need to consider in managing this issue. It is no harm for employers on a regular basis to take a step back and review their levels of absenteeism in the workplace. 

Very often, companies fail to do so and can be quite shocked to discover that they have quite a high level of absenteeism. This can have developed due to a culture of tolerance that has developed in the workplace which in turn allows absenteeism in the workplace to become acceptable. 

Short term absenteeism 

Short term absences can, in fact, be more difficult to manage than an employee out on long term sick leave. For example, employers should give consideration to how they treat employees who are consistently late for work. 

Furthermore, employers need to give consideration to how many days’ uncertified leave they will allow in any 12 month period. At the very least, employers should oblige employees to self-certify when they return from a short term absence to confirm the reason for their absence. 

Many employers experience the regular Monday/Friday absences. This issue should be addressed. For example, employers should consider whether or not their Sick Leave Policy should be amended to provide for medical certification if an employee is out on sick leave on a Friday or Monday. 

Alternatively, the employer could consider withdrawing payment for absences on these days. Some employers have introduced a policy whereby employees are disqualified from overtime for that week if they are absent on a Friday or a Monday. Alternatively, employers could look at their bonus schemes and deal with regular Monday/Friday absences in that context. 

Another initiative that can prove very successful in combating regular short term absences is the return to work interview. This lets employees know in no uncertain terms that their absence has been noted, albeit a short absence from the workplace, and also provides the employer with an opportunity to find out information about the employee’s absence which might be relevant in the overall employment relationship context. 

If return to work interviews are being introduced, make sure that the message is sent to employees that these are for information purposes only and are not a means of punishing or harassing the employee on returning to work. 

If Managers are being charged with conducting the return to work interviews, employers should ensure that the Manager is obliged inform HR of the outcome of the interview and HR must ensure that there is a consistency in the application of a policy across the organisation. 

If an employee has established a continued pattern of short term absences over a protracted period then consideration may have to be given to termination of the employee’s contract of employment. In this regard, an employer will have to prove the following -

  • That there has been a pattern over a protracted period.
  • That it is reasonable to conclude the situation will not improve.
  • That the continuation of the level of absenteeism was unacceptable and was causing prejudice to the employer.
  • That the employer took reasonable steps to ascertain the true medical situation with regard to the employee.
  • The employer further informed him/herself of all relevant information relating to the employee.
  • That the absenteeism level was excessive compared to other employees in the organisation.
  • That the employee received warnings about the absenteeism and that these warnings were successive and progressive.
  • That the employer afforded the employee a reasonable time to improve and that the employee was given an opportunity to be represented and heard prior to any decision being taken to terminate their employment.

Long Term Absenteeism 

Long term absences raise different issues for an employer. Employers have the right to refer employees for medical examination if they are on long term sick leave. The Sick Leave Policy should place an obligation on the employee to remain in regular contact with the employer. 

In this regard, the mere submission of medical certificates on an ongoing basis should not be accepted as sufficient contact in this regard and employees should be obliged to telephone the employer on a regular basis. 

If employers are giving consideration to the issue of home visits to an employee who is on long term sick leave, they must ensure that they are only doing so with the employee’s consent and that there is no question that the employee can make an argument that they are being harassed. In other words, do not arrive unexpectedly at an employee’s home place while they are out on long term sick leave.
If an employee who has been out on long term sick leave is returning to work, then consideration needs to be given to the basis upon which they can return. Obviously, an employer, from a health and safety perspective, should satisfy themselves that the employee is fit to return to work. Employers can and should seek their own medical opinion in this regard. 

Once the employee is certified fit to return, the employer needs to give consideration to whether the employee is returning to work full time or on an initial part time basis in order to reintegrate into the workplace. It may be that the employee can only return on the basis of doing light duties. 

Employers are not obliged to create positions for employees on long term sick leave who wish to return to work on a particular basis but employers must give consideration to making reasonable accommodation for employees who are returning from long term sick leave.
Employers should always establish the factual position relating to the capability of an employee who has been out on long term sick leave and, to what, if any, specialist facilities are available at what cost. 

Enquiries in this regard are adequate only if the employee is involved at each level and can submit medical evidence and make submissions to the employer, particularly in advance of any decision being made to terminate the employee’s contract of employment.
Employees on sick leave whose contract of employment is terminated have a number of legal remedies available to them. For example, they can issue a claim under the Employment Equality legislation for disability discrimination. 

In this regard, it is important for employers to note that it has been held recently by the Equality Tribunal that alcoholism is a disability within the meaning of the Employment Equality legislation. 

Alternatively, an employee with 12 month’s continuous service can issue a claim for unfair dismissal and in this regard the procedure adopted by the employer prior to the termination of the contract of employment is extremely important. 

Alternatively, the employee can issue a civil claim for wrongful dismissal and it is important to remember in this regard that the 12 month employment pre-condition is not applicable to civil claims. 

Conclusion 

It is clear from the above that managing absenteeism in the workplace is a tricky area for employers. It is an area that needs to be kept under constant review by the employers to ensure that they are fully compliant and furthermore to ensure that a culture is not allowed to develop in the workplace whereby certain levels of absenteeism become acceptable. 

Jennifer Cashman, Partner, Ronan Daly Jermyn Solicitors, 12 South Mall, Cork

 
 

This website is a collaborative initiative between the Carmichael Centre, The Wheel and the CSEF.
_______________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________
For technical assistance please contact: paul@wheel.ie

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software